:: facebook FORUM ::
Some time ago I created facebook group entitled
+ inconstant sol +
I think it is time to let you know, dear inconstant soleros (if that is ok) that group is here to discuss and share Love of Music in digital age in general. All you are welcome to join, discuss and post there. Happy Daze ;)
+ inconstant sol +
I think it is time to let you know, dear inconstant soleros (if that is ok) that group is here to discuss and share Love of Music in digital age in general. All you are welcome to join, discuss and post there. Happy Daze ;)
.jpg)
14 comments:
Facebook bad. (:>)
will IS continue only on FB or we can find it here again in the future?
r
It's a separate thing (but related).
fiuuuu....
Hate FB
Considering the general orientation of the websites linked on the right side of the page under "Politics", it's surprising that you would choose Facebook.
The Facebook group was initiated by our member Milo and the linked websites on the right side were added by the founder of the blog, Sotise, years before the Facebook page was launched.
yes the Facebook page is the personal initiative of one contributor, is it in contradiction with the original ideology of this blog? One can ask if the original ideology that associate free music with advanced political ideas have probably been shared only by very few people. The majority of the followers are mostly if not saying only interested by music and by the fact that this music is in a free access. Considering that, even if a Facebook page can appears as very far from the original political idea of the blog, it is not more distant than the low political consciousness than the rest of the exchanges here. It is also perhaps a sign of the time in the fact that even Facebook can recycle conversations about free jazz and underground music. The paradox of Facebook is that it is the perfect illustration of the actual way of life but it is also the way to share meetings for strikes and street demonstrations so...
Does Inconstant Sol even need an ideology? And if you want to discuss politics surely there are better places to do so than here, or on FB. In my experience intelligent discussion of such matters is virtually impossible on the Internet. It always descends into insults and cheap sloganeering, a collection of individual rants to which no-one is really listening.
And there's no need for strikes at the moment...most people are barely working as it is!
Who are you to decide what is the best place to talk about politic? Obviously you haven't understood my message where ideology means for me something more important than the basic fact of politic, obviously you also haven't noticed that there is a chapter devoted to politic on this blog that contains many links of organisations and associations that are mostly alter globalist and you also haven't noticed that in the free form section some exchanges took places where Sottise, me and other people shared ideas and point of views. I haven't followed this topic because my english is not good enough to explain some point of views but if I want to do it here in the future I will do whatever your opinion about more appropriate places to do it.
You’re right, it’s not for me to decide, but then I didn’t. I simply suggested there might be better places to discuss “politics” (a word you used in your previous post). I’m hardly in a position to censure anyone, and why would I want to?
I suppose I should have borne in mind the first rule of Internet posting: if it can be misconstrued, there will always be at least one person who will do so, and usually take umbrage.
@Colin Green
There is one thing of interest in your preview comment, the fact that you say that talking about politic often finish in disputes. You are right but this observation appears also as a reason to stop definitely to talk about politic and to participate in the debate. This is exactly what the promoters of neoliberalism want. Many people don’t talk no more about politic because they are afraid of the discussion and the immediate consequence of it or because they think that the reality is now too complicated. So all of us undergo the consequence of this crazy and deadly vision of the world and the revolt is small or sporadic.
To give you another exemple of this thinking process of finding a reason to give up, i will take the example of the pandemic situation in France.
it’s been in several occasions that I heard people angry at the ones who don’t were the mask and who don’t respect clearly the hygienic distance. They are right but this way of thinking reveal several aspects. First it designate as guilty our immediate neighbours in the public transport or our colleagues but this doesn’t includes the real responsibles of the situation, our government. But secondarily this offer a vision that the people who don’t respect the hygienic instructions are potentially carriers of the virus, forgetting to consider that they may not be carriers of it at all and that they can therefore put themselves in danger. This reveals that we have clearly identified that there is an enemy but the most dangerous enemy is probably more a neoliberalist president than the guy who is sitting near me in the public transport.
What interest me in all cases is the thought process which leads to refraining from pointing out the real responsibles either by abdicating the political discussion or by identifying the immediate culprits. In any case this translate into the avoidance of facing the cure situation which show us that in any case the cure system of governance is dying, remain to be seen if we want to disappear with it or no?
I think the FB blog is just fine. Cheers :)
Oooo, how this has become a boring blog. You are a total disaster.
You allow one arrogant and lying CS so much space. I think there's a no man who he didn't hurt. This guy is irritating, subversive and dangerous, and now he would still like to discuss politics as well???
Funny.
yes this blog is really boring, that is probably the reason why you keep on following it. Thank you for your invaluable contribution.
Post a Comment